We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.Ī Lambeth Palace spokesperson told reporters earlier this week: “Oaths and commitments of allegiance are very much commonplace all over the country, from parliaments and assemblies to the church, police, armed forces, citizenship ceremonies and even in scouts and guiding.” For more information see our Privacy Policy. Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. There’s no individual who can claim the credit for this service.” skip past newsletter promotion When asked directly this week if the people’s homage had been his idea, Justin Welby, the archbishop of Canterbury, told the BBC: “The whole service is a major collaborative process in which everyone worked through, a huge range of people work through the whole thing. The campaign group Republic called the idea “nonsense” and “offensive”.įollowing Dimbleby’s comments, Lambeth Palace repeated its insistence that all elements in the coronation service were drawn up in close consultation with Buckingham Palace.Īt a briefing on the coronation service last Friday, a Lambeth Palace spokesperson said the service reflected “complete consensus between Lambeth Palace, the royal household and His Majesty’s government.” The homage of the people was met with widespread derision, with many saying such an oath of loyalty was more appropriate to feudal times than the 21st century. Lambeth Palace said it hoped people watching the coronation at home or in public venues such as parks would say the words: “I swear that I will pay true allegiance to your majesty, and to your heirs and successors, according to law. Traditionally such declarations were said by hereditary peers. Lambeth Palace, the archbishop’s office, announced last weekend that, as part of the coronation service, for the first time the general public would be invited to join in a declaration of loyalty to the king. It was “so different from the king that I know to ask for or expect homage”. The homage of the people was “most bizarre” and was likely to be the outcome of “miscommunication”, Dimbleby said. I think it was well-intentioned and rather ill-advised.”ĭimbleby, a veteran broadcaster who has been a close friend and confidant of Charles for about 30 years and has recorded many interviews with him, is likely to be familiar with the king’s thinking. ![]() I don’t know for certain but it would seem to me that this was an initiative by the archbishop who, as we know, is strongly evangelical, who thought it would be a good thing to give everyone a chance to pay that homage. “He wants, I think, to feel that people will share in the event – and I don’t quite know how this might have happened. He’s never wanted, as far as I know, to have anyone pay homage to him, except in mock terms as a joke. ![]() Dimbleby told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “I can think of nothing that would find more abhorrent.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |